NPR Editors Break Down 2026 Midterm Questions on Polling, Redistricting, and Power
Senior correspondents address listener concerns about state-level polling errors, the role of ballot measures in multiple states, and the potential impact of a divided government.
By Alejandro Ruiz ·

NPR senior political editor Domenico Montanaro and his colleagues have released a series of answers to listener questions regarding the 2026 midterm elections. The responses cover the reliability of recent polls, the strategic importance of down-ballot races, and the likely consequences of a split government in Washington. The team also addressed the state of political debates and the influence of redistricting measures on the final outcomes.
Montanaro began by addressing the accuracy of polling data. He noted that while national polls have remained fairly accurate on the overall race, state-level surveys have produced several high-profile misses. He attributed part of the problem to the decline of local journalism, which reduces the funding available for rigorous, frequent state polling. Montanaro emphasized that polls have a margin of error, typically between three and four percentage points, which creates a range of six to eight points. He argued that reporters should focus on trends over time rather than specific margins in close races.
The correspondents discussed why they find midterm elections engaging. Congressional reporter Sam Gringlas said that covering House and Senate races allows for more intimate access to candidates compared to presidential campaigns. He cited recent coverage of candidates at an antique shop, a farmer's market, and a smokejumper-themed brewery as examples of this closer interaction. Senior political correspondent Tamara Keith added that she enjoys the variety of contests in any election year, though she admitted the current cycle is testing her energy levels.
Keith highlighted Nevada's 2nd Congressional District as a race she is watching closely. She described the district as a political puzzle because it is a Republican-leaning area that has not elected a Democrat in over 40 years. The Republican nominee is a Trump-backed candidate who recently moved to the district, while the Democratic nominee is a former Miss Nevada and state legislator. Keith noted that the retiring Republican congressman is publicly criticizing his own party's nominee, adding to the unpredictability of the race.
Political correspondent Ashley Lopez pointed to several ballot measures that could reshape congressional maps. In Maryland, voters are considering a constitutional amendment that would allow Democrats to add an additional seat, a measure that currently appears unlikely to pass. In Colorado, a proposal aims to make it harder for the legislature to redraw district lines mid-decade. Missouri is weighing a redistricting change that could help Republicans flip a seat. Alaska voters are again deciding whether to keep their unique primary and ranked-choice voting system, a measure that has historically been close.
Montanaro and Keith identified other key races to monitor. They pointed to House contests in South Florida and South Texas as indicators of how Latino voters are moving in this election cycle. Montanaro also expressed interest in the California wealth tax ballot initiative, noting that tens of millions of dollars have already been spent on the campaign. He also watched the Nevada governor's race between incumbent Joe Lombardo and Attorney General Aaron Ford, where past legal issues of the challenger are becoming a focal point.
If Democrats take control of one or both houses of Congress, Montanaro explained that the legislative process would likely slow down. He stated that with only about 10% of congressional districts being competitive, there is little incentive for compromise between the parties. He predicted that the primary impact of a Democratic majority would be increased investigations and oversight of the executive branch. He noted that impeachment would be a politically delicate strategy, citing the political cost Republicans faced in the late 1990s.
Historical context suggests that the president's party rarely gains seats during midterms. Montanaro pointed out that since World War II, this has happened only twice: in 1998 and in 2002 following the 9/11 attacks. The correspondents concluded by addressing the role of debates. They noted that incumbents are often reluctant to debate to avoid raising a challenger's profile. However, they maintained that debates remain a tool for voters to hear candidates move beyond talking points when journalists press on vulnerabilities.
Source: WBHM · original report published
More Politics · Birmingham news · Report a business · Got a Story?






